|
|
Missing Flash! You have been summoned to join the Chat Channel
|
|
Expand All
Scoreboard |
| Score |
Away |
Home |
Score |
Reviews |
Statistical Leaders |
36 |
 |
 |
35 |
|
Passing:
Tom Brady (Coac), 198 yards, 2 TD
Rushing:
Maurice Morris (Curs), 65 yards, 1 TD
Receiving:
Rob Gronkowski (Curs), 94 yards
Points:
BUF Team DF (Coac), 17 points
Defense:
BUF Team DF (Coac), 17 points |
|
Vegas has Coac favored by 5 points (Line is 5.0)
Cursed No Moore leads all-time series 11-2-2 (Met once in the postseason)
Cursed No Moore has scored the most points in the series, 631-466
Last meeting was 2010 Week 3. Curs defeated Coac, 65-63
|
41 |
 |
 |
63 |
|
Passing:
Matt Schaub (HOGS), 227 yards, 1 TD, 1 rush TD
Rushing:
Ray Rice (BJ), 99 yards, 3 TD
Receiving:
Calvin Johnson (HOGS), 125 yards, 1 TD
Points:
Ray Rice (BJ), 21 points
Defense:
NO Team DF (HOGS), 11 points |
|
Vegas has BJ favored by 6 points (Line is 6.0)
Warthogs leads all-time series 11-9-1 (3 postseason matchups)
Big Johnsons has scored the most points in the series, 918-785
Last meeting was 2010 Week 10. BJ defeated HOGS, 89-16
|
50 |
 |
 |
75 |
|
Passing:
Cam (2) Newton (XMen), 343 yards, 3 TD
Rushing:
LeSean McCoy (Lime), 200 yards, 2 TD
Receiving:
Michael Crabtree (XMen), 54 yards, 1 TD
Points:
CIN Team DF (Lime), 24 points
Defense:
CIN Team DF (Lime), 24 points |
|
Vegas has Lime favored by 17 points (Line is -17.0)
These teams have even lifetime records in series, 2-2 (Never met in the postseason)
LimeJuicers has scored the most points in the series, 210-178
Last meeting was 2010 Week 11. Lime defeated XMen, 56-46
|
63 |
 |
 |
65 |
|
Passing:
Matthew Stafford (Rpr), 288 yards, 3 TD
Rushing:
Steven (1) Jackson (Blue), 191 yards, 2 TD
Receiving:
Scott Chandler (Blue), 35 yards, 2 TD
Points:
Steven (1) Jackson (Blue), 19 points
Defense:
TEN Team DF (Rpr), 10 points |
|
Vegas has Rpr favored by 8.5 points (Line is 8.5)
Deacon Blues leads all-time series 1-0 (Never met in the postseason)
Deacon Blues has scored the most points in the series, 66-50
Last meeting was 2010 Week 9. Blue defeated Rpr, 66-50
|
30 |
 |
 |
81 |
|
Passing:
Michael Vick (Daze), 329 yards, 2 TD
Rushing:
Frank Gore (Daze), 134 yards, 1 TD
Receiving:
Brandon Lloyd (Daze), 53 yards, 1 TD
Points:
DET Team DF (Daze), 25 points
Defense:
DET Team DF (Daze), 25 points |
|
Vegas has CJ favored by 2 points (Line is 2.0)
CJs Scrubs leads all-time series 14-5-2 (4 postseason matchups)
CJs Scrubs has scored the most points in the series, 831-715
Last meeting was 2010 Week 1. Daze defeated CJ, 48-21
|
38 |
 |
 |
45 |
|
Passing:
Alex (1) Smith (BOHI), 199 yards, 1 TD
Rushing:
Adrian (2) Peterson (BOHI), 162 yards, 1 TD, 1 rec TD
Receiving:
Nate Washington (KM), 37 yards, 1 TD, 1 rush TD
Points:
Adrian (2) Peterson (BOHI), 18 points
Defense:
SF Team DF (BOHI), 6 points |
|
Vegas has BOHI favored by 14.5 points (Line is -14.5)
Klunkers Marauders leads all-time series 9-7-1 (2 postseason matchups)
BOHICA has scored the most points in the series, 652-651
Last meeting was 2010 Week 1. KM defeated BOHI, 61-32
|
| Out |
|
Rank |
Overall |
Division |
Interdiv |
Home |
Away |
| Team |
LR |
Pts |
Rec |
win% |
Strk |
Strk |
PF |
Avg |
PA |
Avg |
Rec |
Strk |
Rec |
Strk |
Rec |
Strk |
Rec |
Strk |
| |
BOHI |
3 |
6 |
5-3 |
62.50 |
1W |
1W |
443 |
55.4 |
397 |
49.6 |
2-1 |
2W |
3-2 |
1L |
3-1 |
3W |
2-2 |
1L |
| |
Daze |
6 |
5 |
4-4 |
50.00 |
1W |
1W |
454 |
56.8 |
404 |
50.5 |
2-1 |
1W |
2-3 |
1L |
2-3 |
1W |
2-1 |
1W |
| |
CJ |
7 |
11 |
4-4 |
50.00 |
1L |
1L |
392 |
49.0 |
422 |
52.8 |
1-2 |
2L |
3-2 |
3W |
2-1 |
2W |
2-3 |
1L |
| |
KM |
12 |
12 |
2-6 |
25.00 |
3L |
3L |
346 |
43.3 |
443 |
55.4 |
1-2 |
1L |
1-4 |
4L |
1-3 |
1L |
1-3 |
3L |
| To |
|
Rank |
Overall |
Division |
Interdiv |
Home |
Away |
| Team |
LR |
Pts |
Rec |
win% |
Strk |
Strk |
PF |
Avg |
PA |
Avg |
Rec |
Strk |
Rec |
Strk |
Rec |
Strk |
Rec |
Strk |
| |
Lime |
1 |
1 |
6-2 |
75.00 |
3W |
3W |
549 |
68.6 |
414 |
51.8 |
2-1 |
1W |
4-1 |
4W |
3-1 |
3W |
3-1 |
2W |
| |
XMen |
8 |
9 |
4-4 |
50.00 |
1L |
1L |
409 |
51.1 |
397 |
49.6 |
2-1 |
1L |
2-3 |
1W |
2-2 |
1W |
2-2 |
1L |
| |
Blue |
10 |
10 |
3-5 |
37.50 |
1W |
1W |
398 |
49.8 |
503 |
62.9 |
2-1 |
2W |
1-4 |
2L |
3-2 |
1W |
0-3 |
3L |
| |
Rpr |
11 |
8 |
3-5 |
37.50 |
5L |
5L |
415 |
51.9 |
470 |
58.8 |
0-3 |
3L |
3-2 |
2L |
1-3 |
3L |
2-2 |
2L |
| Lunch |
|
Rank |
Overall |
Division |
Interdiv |
Home |
Away |
| Team |
LR |
Pts |
Rec |
win% |
Strk |
Strk |
PF |
Avg |
PA |
Avg |
Rec |
Strk |
Rec |
Strk |
Rec |
Strk |
Rec |
Strk |
| |
Coac |
2 |
7 |
6-2 |
75.00 |
2W |
2W |
432 |
54.0 |
400 |
50.0 |
3-0 |
3W |
3-2 |
1W |
1-2 |
1L |
5-0 |
5W |
| |
HOGS |
4 |
3 |
4-4 |
50.00 |
1W |
1W |
478 |
59.8 |
481 |
60.1 |
2-1 |
2W |
2-3 |
1L |
3-2 |
1W |
1-2 |
2L |
| |
BJ |
5 |
4 |
4-4 |
50.00 |
1L |
1L |
456 |
57.0 |
482 |
60.3 |
1-2 |
2L |
3-2 |
2W |
1-2 |
1W |
3-2 |
1L |
| |
Curs |
9 |
2 |
3-5 |
37.50 |
1L |
1L |
502 |
62.8 |
461 |
57.6 |
0-3 |
3L |
3-2 |
1W |
1-3 |
3L |
2-2 |
1W |
| Additional Team Statistics |
|
Waiver |
Total |
Scoring |
Coaching |
Outcomes |
|
| Team |
Power |
WW |
Points |
Strt |
Ben |
Bon |
Hi |
Lo |
Eff |
Hi |
Lo |
Chk |
Ups |
Luck |
| BOHI |
23.69 |
10 |
443 |
443 |
124 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
89.68% |
2 |
1 |
0.0 |
2.0 |
6.82 |
| Daze |
23.49 |
7 |
454 |
454 |
127 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
91.53% |
5 |
0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
-6.25 |
| CJ |
20.42 |
5 |
392 |
392 |
178 |
0 |
0 |
3 |
85.22% |
1 |
0 |
0.0 |
1.0 |
15.91 |
| KM |
15.16 |
1 |
346 |
346 |
149 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
79.91% |
2 |
2 |
1.0 |
0.0 |
-7.95 |
| Lime |
30.97 |
12 |
549 |
549 |
173 |
0 |
2 |
0 |
91.81% |
2 |
1 |
1.0 |
0.0 |
1.14 |
| XMen |
20.28 |
6 |
409 |
408 |
129 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
86.47% |
0 |
0 |
1.0 |
0.0 |
6.82 |
| Blue |
17.50 |
2 |
398 |
398 |
119 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
85.59% |
0 |
1 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
3.41 |
| Rpr |
20.43 |
3 |
415 |
415 |
195 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
84.87% |
0 |
1 |
1.0 |
0.0 |
-5.68 |
| Coac |
26.84 |
11 |
432 |
432 |
156 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
88.89% |
1 |
0 |
0.0 |
2.0 |
20.45 |
| HOGS |
24.36 |
9 |
478 |
476 |
155 |
2 |
1 |
0 |
88.68% |
3 |
0 |
1.0 |
0.0 |
-7.39 |
| BJ |
23.47 |
8 |
456 |
456 |
147 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
87.36% |
1 |
0 |
0.0 |
1.0 |
-4.55 |
| Curs |
22.96 |
4 |
502 |
502 |
158 |
0 |
2 |
1 |
90.78% |
3 |
2 |
1.0 |
0.0 |
-22.73 |
|